20/04/2015
Share this story Share on Facebook icon Share on Twitter icon Share on Pinterest icon Share on Google Plus icon Share on Linked In icon Share via Email icon

Regency in sixteenth-century Scotland

246ab9d2-7a02-4c0a-bfe0-72c73ecc6ab0

Political historian Dr Amy Blakeway explores the dangers and challenges facing those who acted as regent during the minority of a king or queen in sixteenth-century Scotland.

When we think of the sixteenth century, most of us immediately remember the famous monarchs who ruled throughout Europe: in Scotland, the Stewarts, and, further afield, their English cousins the Tudors and French relations the Valois.

The reality was somewhat different. For fifty years of the sixteenth century Scotland was not ruled by Kings and Queens. This was because of the simple fact that every monarch came to the throne as a child under two years old – most famously, of course, Mary, Queen of Scots (pictured), was a mere six days old when her father died and she inherited the throne. In a society where the monarch held real political power, as well as being a symbolic leader of the nation, not having a King or Queen presented real problems.

Who would call Parliament? Who would negotiate for war and peace? Who would settle disagreements and distribute justice?


In Scotland, this gaping hole in the political system during a monarch’s childhood, known as a royal minority, was overcome by delegating the monarch’s responsibilities to someone who would rule in their place as regent. This lucky person would, effectively, take the monarch’s place: living in the gorgeous royal palaces of Holyrood, Stirling and Falkland, able to wear the monarch’s jewellery (except the crown) – and, in one case, when James Hamilton earl of Arran became regent after the death of his cousin James V in 1542, wearing the dead monarch’s clothes!

DANGERS AND CHALLENGES

However, being regent was by no means easy. First, despite the fact that the Scots had been dealing with child monarchs for centuries there was no clear law stating who had the legal right to be regent. At the start of the sixteenth century, regents were either appointed by the monarch in their will or the person who was next in the royal succession was appointed. After 1567, when Mary, Queen of Scots was deposed, a new theory was developed that regents ought to be elected by Parliament. Because the Scots disagreed on the correct way to pick a regent, it meant that even after they were appointed any regent was open to be challenged.

To make matters even worse, people disagreed about when a monarch could be considered an adult! The ages eighteen, fourteen (for boys) and twelve (for girls) were all suggested. However, if a monarch thought they were old enough to rule, they could just declare themselves an adult – regardless of their age – and the regent would forfeit power. This happened with James V in 1524, and with his grandson James VI, in 1578. Both were not yet thirteen.

Even if no-one was actively challenging a regent, other pressures made it difficult to rule. Foreign affairs were especially challenging. Monarchs of England and France both saw a child monarch in Scotland as a good opportunity to try to gain more control. Sometimes these challenges from abroad and within Scotland split over into war. Two regents were assassinated whilst fulfilling their duties: James Stewart, earl of Moray (pictured), in January 1570, and his successor, Matthew Stewart, earl of Lennox, only twenty months later, in September 1571.

Every government struggles with the problem of money, but this was particularly difficult for regents. Queen mothers had a right to one-third of the crown income if they outlived their husband. This meant regents were trying to run the country with only two-thirds of what a monarch might expect – often whilst paying for an expensive war.

With all of these problems, it is no surprise that for a long time periods of royal minority were dismissed as being dangerous times with no effective government. However, looking beneath the surface shows that it was possible for regents to rule effectively, negotiating treaties, holding Parliaments and dispensing justice. Bringing them back into the picture helps us to understand not only periods of royal minority, but the monarchs on whose behalf regents ruled.

Dr Amy Blakeway is the author of Regency in Sixteenth-Century Scotland, published by Boydell & Brewer. Drawing on a broad archival base of neglected manuscript materials, ranging from financial accounts, to the justiciary court records, to diplomatic correspondence scattered from Edinburgh to Paris, the book reveals a greater level of continuity between the personal rules of the adult Stewarts and of their regents than has hitherto been appreciated.

Find out more about Scotland's kings and queens in our expert history section.

Back to "Expert history articles" Category

20/04/2015 Share this story   Share on Facebook icon Share on Twitter icon Share on Pinterest icon Share on Google Plus icon Share on Linked In icon Share via Email icon

Recent Updates

Covenanter James Renwick was executed - On this day in history

Scottish Minister James Renwick was executed on 17 February 1688 for refusing to swear fealty to King James ...


On this day in history - Government forces attempted to capture Prince Charles Edward Stuart

Government forces, under the leadership of Lord Louden, failed in their attempt to capture Charles Edward ...


The Caledonian Railway Company opened - On this day in history

The Caledonian Railway Company opened on 15 February 1848, running trains between Glasgow and London.


'Significant milestone' as full survey results of German Fleet salvage sites archaeology project published online

The extent and composition of the salvage site of the German High Seas Fleet, that was scuttled almost a ...


Other Articles

Alexander Graham Bell filed a patent for the telephone - On this day in history

Alexander Graham Bell filed a patent for the telephone on 14 February 1876.


The Glencoe Massacre took place - On this day in Scottish history

The Glencoe Massacre took place on 13 February 1692.


Reverend Henry Duncan died - On this day in history

Reverend Henry Duncan, founder of one of the world's first commercial savings banks, died on 12 February ...


History Scotland Lectures III - Global Scotland in the age of Brexit: Historical perspectives on the Scottish diaspora and migration

The third in the History Scotland Lectures series, in association with the University of Dundee Centre for ...